Wednesday, April 13, 2011
The best way to listen to "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds" is to be so absorbed in the verse and the mysterious, swirly parkscape it presents that you fail to anticipate what's happening next, so that the metaphysical departure of the chorus is experienced not as an inevitable part of the song's structure but as a spontaneous and extremely lucky accident. Of course, you can't will yourself to hear the chorus this way, any more than you can throw a surprise party for yourself; it just sneaks up on you sometimes. But here's something you can do on purpose: try to hear each of the three performances of the chorus as distinct event with a unique interpretation of time. I'm pretty sure the second one is the slowest and heaviest. Moreover, each chorus seems to be deeply rhythmically undecided within itself; maybe it's an epiphenomenon of the flanging, but it seems to me if you follow the drums you can hear it like a hip-hop recording where the sampled drumbeat not only understands something different about 16th notes but is oddly matched to the song's primary tempo, speeding up over the course of the bar and synchronizing again on the downbeat. Such effects are more evident on the mono mix, which, because slower, does less to blur anomalies of time, as pounded out by animals, into the evenly divided continuum of geometry.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

5 comments:
i believe it was Walter Everett who alerted me to the fact (i can't hear it but it sounds like you're starting to) that the chorus is supposed to be a precise metric modulation that should lock w the main pulse. ok i get it now: quarter notes in 3 equal quarter notes in 4. but the take they kept messes it up, they drag. on another take they get it good. check revolver through anthology. or it's in his timbre paper but that doesn't seem right. the beatles slowed down. i remember seeing a chart once that graphed how that happened overall
not sure i have this right. are they trying for something trickier off a triplet or something? do they speed up?
It's Allan Moore who suggests this. I personally haven't been able to count it out in a way that shows uniformity of time.
Fuck he's right.
Moore: "The verse and refrain are distinguished by their tempi: the first verse is in a slow 12/8 (four triplet beats to the bar) at 46 bpm, while the refrain doubles the tempo (to 93 bpm) but replaces triplets with straight beats."
Hearing the chorus in the verse: count the triplets 1-2-3, then put the bass drum on 1 and the snare on the + of 2; this is the beat of the chorus.
Hearing the verse in the chorus: count quarter-note triplets over the beat (as in 6 per bar); these are the triplets of Lennon's melody.
Post a Comment